Search for: "Barnesandnoble.com, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2012, 7:16 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Essex issued Order No. 33 denying Respondents Barnes and Noble, Inc. and BarnesandNoble.com’s (collectively, “B&N”) motions for summary determination of invalidity and noninfringement in Certain Handheld Electronic Computing Devices, Related Software, And Components Thereof (Inv. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 2:48 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Essex issued the public version of Order No. 32 (dated January 31, 2012) granting Microsoft’s Motion for Summary Determination, thereby eliminating an affirmative defense of patent misuse raised by Barnes & Noble, Inc. and barnesandnoble.com (collectively, “Barnes & Noble”) in Certain Handheld Electronic Computing Devices, Related Software, And Components Thereof (Inv. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 5:25 am
Adrea, LLC ("Adrea") filed a patent infringement action against Barnes & Noble, Inc., barnesandnoble.com llc, and Nook Media LLC (collectively, "B&N"), which alleged that B&N's e-reader Nook infringed U.S. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:03 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  The Respondents are Barnes & Noble, Inc. of New York, New York, barnesandnoble.com LLC of New York, New York, Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. of Taiwan, Foxconn Electronics, Inc. of Taiwan, Foxconn Precision Component (Shenzhen) Co. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 11:55 am by Eric Schweibenz
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified the following as respondents in this investigation: Barnes & Noble, Inc. of New York, New York barnesandnoble.com LLC of New York, New York Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. of Taiwan Foxconn Electronics, Inc. of Taiwan Foxconn Precision Component (Shenzhen) Co. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 2:43 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Barnesandnoble.com, Inc., 239 F.3d 1343, 1351 (Fed. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 6:03 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  In the Order, ALJ Essex granted-in-part and denied-in-part Complainant Microsoft Corporation’s (“Microsoft”) motion to declassify the names and roles of particular entities designated as confidential by Respondents Barnes & Noble, Inc. and barnesandnoble.com (collectively, “Barnes & Noble”) and requested a shortened response time. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 8:58 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Barnesandnoble.com, Inc.,239 F.3d 1343, 1351 (Fed. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 12:31 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Patent Nos. 5,778,372 (the ‘372 patent), 5,889,522 (the ‘522 patent), 6,339,780 (the ‘780 patent), 6,891,551 (the ‘551 patent), and 6,957,233 (the ‘233 patent) (collectively, the “asserted patents”): Barnes & Noble, Inc. of New York, New York barnesandnoble.com LLC of New York, New York Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. of Taiwan Foxconn Electronics, Inc. of Taiwan Foxconn Precision Component (Shenzhen) Co. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 11:26 pm
Barnesandnoble.com, Inc., 239 F.3d 1343, 1350 (Fed. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 6:41 pm by Dennis Crouch
Barnesandnoble.com, Inc., 239 F.3d 1343, 1351 (Fed. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 11:22 am
Barnesandnoble.com, Inc., 239 F.3d 1343, 1350 (Fed. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 12:12 am
Barnesandnoble.com, Inc., 239 F.3d 1343, 1351 (Fed. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 9:55 am by Eric Schweibenz
Respondents Barnes & Noble, Inc. and barnesandnoble.com LLC (collectively, “Barnes & Noble”) opposed the motion, arguing that (1) subsections (A) and (B) of § 1337(a)(3) are limited to manufacturing activities and neither Microsoft, HTC (maker of Microsoft’s Windows Phone 7 domestic product, the HTC Surround) nor Amazon.com make the domestic industry products in the U.S.; (2) Microsoft failed to show that Amazon.com’s investments are… [read post]